Boston: Elsevier, 2021. — 117 p.
Big Data Analysis of Nanoscience Bibliometrics, Patent, and Funding Data (2000-2019) presents an evaluation of nanotechnologies outputs (academic outputs and patents) and their impact from 2000-2019. The evaluation uses Elsevier’s Scopus (the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature), SciVal (a scientific research analysis platform), Funding Institutional (a funding database), and PatentSight (a patent analysis platform). It covers four key topics regarding nanoscience research, including: 1) An overview of nano-related scholarly output, 2) Nanoscience and its contribution to basic science, 3) Nanoscience and its impact on and collaboration with industry partners, and 4) Key factors that promote the development of nanoscience.
Copyright
Editors and contributors
Executive summary
Over the past 2 decades, the number of nanoscience-related scientists and academic output has proliferated. The academic im...
Research efforts related to nanoscience rapidly increased over the past 2 decades.
Research efforts related to nanoscience rapidly increased over the past 2 decades.
The field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) score of nano-publications in China and worldwide was rising, indicating a strong...
The field-weighted citation impact (FWCI) score of nano-publications in China and worldwide was rising, indicating a strong...
As an interdisciplinary field, nanoscience served as a comprehensive platform for the integration of basic research, contri...
As an interdisciplinary field, nanoscience served as a comprehensive platform for the integration of basic research, contri...
Nanoscience is closely related to the most prominent research topics.
Nanoscience is closely related to the most prominent research topics.
Compared with China, the United States, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom had a higher academic–corporate collaboratio...
Compared with China, the United States, Germany, Japan, and the United Kingdom had a higher academic–corporate collaboratio...
Among the projects funded by major global funders, the share of nano-related grants continued to increase.
Among the projects funded by major global funders, the share of nano-related grants continued to increase.
The degree of international collaboration in nanoscience was higher than the average for all research fields.
The degree of international collaboration in nanoscience was higher than the average for all research fields.
About the National Center for Nanoscience and Technology and Elsevier
Foreword
The future development of science will continue to make inroads into the macro and micro worlds.
Scholarly output and academic impact of nanoscience
Overview of scholarly output and academic impact of nanoscience
Trends in scholarly output in nanoscience
The number of nano researchers worldwide is rising
Nano-related academic output is rising
Trends in the academic impact of nanoscience
Nano-publications scored a higher field-weighted citation impact than the global average, and China's field-weighted citati...
The share of citations contributed by nano-publications is increasing
About 13.6% of nano-publications were in the top 1% highly cited publications worldwide, a much higher percentage than all...
Analysis of institutional academic research output and impact on nanoscience
Top 20 institutions by number of nano-publications
Comparison of National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, China and global leading institutions
The contribution of nanoscience to basic research
Universality: nanoscience in basic science
Knowledge flow diagram of nanoscience
Nanoscience's contribution to scholarly output of basic science
Nanoscience's contribution to academic impact of basic science
Nanoscience's contribution to basic science in key countries
Scholarly output
Academic impact
Advanced science: nanoscience in highly prominent topics
Nanoscience's connection with the most prominent topics
The most prominent topic clusters related to nanoscience
The highly prominent topic clusters with the most nano-publications (2015–19)
The Highly prominent topic clusters with the highest growth rate, by nano-publication output (2015–19)
The impact of nanoscience on industry
Analysis of academic–corporate collaborations in nanoscience
Academic–corporate collaborative research output in nanoscience
Number of academic–corporate collaborative nano-publications
Academic–corporate collaboration rate
Academic–corporate collaboration network based on coauthorship
Knowledge transfer: patent citations to academic publications
Share of scholarly output cited by patents
Patent citations per 1000 scholarly outputs
Overview of nano-related patents
Top inventing countries by nano-related patents
Top 10 patent owners per Patent Asset Index of nano-related patents
Patent transfer
Patent ownership transfer
Joint ownership
Factors that promote the development of nanoscience
Funding analysis for nanoscience
Number and value of nano-related awards
Nano-related awards in each subject
Top 10 funders by count of nano-related awards
International collaboration in nanoscience
International collaboration rate in nanoscience compared with all research fields combined
Academic impact of China's internationally collaborated nano-publications
Upward trend in international collaborations in nanoscience
Conclusions
Postscript
A - Tables
B - Methodology and indicators
Methodology
Identifying the relevant documents
Identifying the relevant documents
Publication types used in the analysis
Publication types used in the analysis
Counting
Counting
Bibliometric indicators
Patent indicators
C - Data sources
Scopus
SciVal
PatentSight
Elsevier funding institutional
D - All science journal classification subjects
E - Country codes